Our Methodology

Every claim, checked and sourced.

Where the information comes from

Three places. Nothing secondhand.

Their own campaign sites

Candidate positions are quoted word for word from each candidate’s own website, with the page link and the date we pulled it.

Official records

Roll-call and committee votes, bill text, and sponsorships, straight from the legislature that recorded them.

Public filings

Campaign finance reports, financial disclosures, and ethics filings, from the agencies that receive them.

Sources we accept
✓Candidates’ own campaign websites
✓Official roll-call and committee vote records
✓Bill text, amendments, and sponsorship records
✓Full transcripts and unedited recordings
✓Filings with a government body, including late ones
✓Court records and formal ethics findings
Sources we don’t
✕Anonymous sources of any kind
✕Campaign or party press releases, as fact
✕Another outlet’s reporting as the only source
✕Social posts without a document behind them
✕Polling and prediction markets
✕Opposition research handed to us by a campaign
How a claim gets checked

Six steps, every time.

Today, one reviewer works every claim. A second, independent reviewer will be added as the team grows.

01

Capture

A statement, vote, promise, or filing comes in from a public source we monitor: campaign websites, legislative feeds, official sites, and filed documents.

02

Verify the document

We confirm it’s authentic and complete, and archive a copy so the citation still works if the original is taken down.

03

Isolate the claim

The specific, checkable statement is written down word for word. Rhetoric, framing, and predictions are set aside.

04

Gather the record

Every document that bears on the claim is collected, including the ones that cut against what we’d expect to find.

05

Check it again

The claim is worked again from the documents alone before anything is published.

06

Publish with the file

It goes out with every source attached and the date it was published.

How the HUSH. Score works

Said versus did, as one number.

The HUSH. Score measures how closely a politician’s actions have matched the positions they stated. A high score means they did what they said. It doesn’t mean we think those positions are good.

A score only appears on that politician’s own page, next to the promises and votes it was built from. You’ll never see two politicians’ scores side by side.

How each promise is scored
100KeptThey did what they said they would do.
50No outcomeA full term went by and nothing was passed or rejected.
0BrokenThey voted against something they said they wanted when they ran.
Never part of the score
PartyAttendanceSeniorityFundraisingPollingMedia coverageOur own opinion
When we get it wrong

Corrections, in public.

We don’t quietly edit. Every correction sits on top of the original, where anyone can see it.

Think we got one wrong?Send us the claim and the document that shows it. Every dispute with a primary source gets a written response.File a dispute→
Added, never overwrittenThe original stays on the page, struck through, with the correction underneath.
Dated and explainedEvery correction says when it was made, what changed, and why.
You’re toldIf you saved or followed something that changed, you’re notified.
Scores move in publicIf a correction changes a HUSH. Score, both the old and new numbers are shown.
The public corrections log starts on launch day.

“Well done is better than well said.”

Benjamin FranklinPoor Richard’s Almanack, 1737

Promises are easy. The record is what counts.

Join the Movement →